Featured
Table of Contents
A debtor further may file its petition in any location where it is domiciled (i.e. incorporated), where its principal location of organization in the US is situated, where its principal assets in the United States are situated, or in any venue where any of its affiliates can file. See 28 U.S.C.Proposed changes to the venue requirements in the US Bankruptcy Code could threaten the US Bankruptcy Courts' command of international restructurings, and do place at a time united states insolvency of the US' united states competitive advantages are diminishing.
Both propose to get rid of the capability to "forum shop" by leaving out a debtor's location of incorporation from the location analysis, andalarming to global debtorsexcluding cash or cash equivalents from the "primary properties" equation. In addition, any equity interest in an affiliate will be deemed located in the same location as the principal.
Generally, this statement has actually been focused on questionable 3rd party release arrangements carried out in recent mass tort cases such as Purdue Pharma, Kid Scouts of America, and numerous Catholic diocese bankruptcies. These provisions often force financial institutions to launch non-debtor third celebrations as part of the debtor's strategy of reorganization, despite the fact that such releases are perhaps not allowed, at least in some circuits, by the Personal bankruptcy Code.
In effort to mark out this behavior, the proposed legislation claims to restrict "online forum shopping" by forbiding entities from filing in any location other than where their home office or primary physical assetsexcluding cash and equity interestsare situated. Seemingly, these costs would promote the filing of Chapter 11 cases in other US districts, and guide cases away from the favored courts in New York, Delaware and Texas.
Regardless of their admirable purpose, these proposed amendments could have unanticipated and possibly unfavorable effects when viewed from an international restructuring prospective. While congressional testimony and other commentators presume that location reform would simply make sure that domestic companies would file in a different jurisdiction within the US, it is an unique possibility that worldwide debtors might pass on the United States Bankruptcy Courts altogether.
Without the consideration of cash accounts as an avenue towards eligibility, lots of foreign corporations without concrete properties in the United States might not qualify to submit a Chapter 11 bankruptcy in any US jurisdiction. Second, even if they do qualify, worldwide debtors may not have the ability to count on access to the usual and practical reorganization friendly jurisdictions.
How to File for Insolvency in 2026Given the complex issues frequently at play in a worldwide restructuring case, this may cause the debtor and financial institutions some uncertainty. This unpredictability, in turn, might motivate global debtors to file in their own countries, or in other more beneficial countries, rather. Significantly, this proposed place reform comes at a time when numerous countries are emulating the United States and revamping their own restructuring laws.
In a departure from their previous restructuring system which stressed liquidation, the brand-new Code's goal is to reorganize and maintain the entity as a going issue. Thus, debt restructuring contracts might be approved with as little as 30 percent approval from the overall financial obligation. Nevertheless, unlike the US, Italy's brand-new Code will not feature an automated stay of enforcement actions by lenders.
In February of 2021, a Canadian court extended the nation's approval of 3rd party release arrangements. In Canada, companies typically rearrange under the conventional insolvency statutes of the Business' Lenders Plan Act (). 3rd party releases under the CCAAwhile hotly objected to in the USare a common aspect of restructuring strategies.
The recent court decision explains, though, that despite the CBCA's more restricted nature, 3rd party release arrangements might still be appropriate. Therefore, companies might still obtain themselves of a less troublesome restructuring offered under the CBCA, while still receiving the benefits of 3rd party releases. Reliable as of January 1, 2021, the Dutch Act on Court Verification of Extrajudicial Restructuring Plans has developed a debtor-in-possession procedure carried out beyond formal personal bankruptcy procedures.
Reliable since January 1, 2021, Germany's brand-new Act on the Stabilization and Restructuring Structure for Businesses offers pre-insolvency restructuring proceedings. Prior to its enactment, German companies had no option to restructure their debts through the courts. Now, distressed companies can call upon German courts to restructure their debts and otherwise maintain the going issue value of their organization by utilizing a number of the same tools offered in the United States, such as keeping control of their business, enforcing pack down restructuring strategies, and implementing collection moratoriums.
Inspired by Chapter 11 of the US Insolvency Code, this new structure simplifies the debtor-in-possession restructuring process mostly in effort to assist little and medium sized services. While prior law was long criticized as too expensive and too complicated because of its "one size fits all" approach, this new legislation incorporates the debtor in possession design, and provides for a streamlined liquidation process when needed In June 2020, the UK enacted the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act of 2020 ().
Notably, CIGA provides for a collection moratorium, revokes certain provisions of pre-insolvency contracts, and allows entities to propose an arrangement with shareholders and lenders, all of which permits the formation of a cram-down strategy comparable to what may be accomplished under Chapter 11 of the US Personal Bankruptcy Code. In 2017, Singapore adopted enacted the Business (Amendment) Act 2017 (Singapore), that made major legislative changes to the restructuring provisions of the Singapore Companies Act (Cap 50) 2006.
As a result, the law has actually significantly enhanced the restructuring tools available in Singapore courts and moved Singapore as a leading center for insolvency in the Asia-Pacific. In May of 2016, India enacted the Insolvency and Insolvency Code, which totally upgraded the bankruptcy laws in India. This legislation seeks to incentivize further investment in the nation by providing higher certainty and effectiveness to the restructuring process.
Given these recent changes, global debtors now have more alternatives than ever. Even without the proposed limitations on eligibility, foreign entities may less need to flock to the US as in the past. Further, should the United States' location laws be amended to avoid easy filings in particular hassle-free and helpful venues, worldwide debtors might begin to consider other areas.
Unique thanks to Dallas associate Michael Berthiaume who prepared and authored this content under the guidance of Rebecca Winthrop, Of Counsel in our Los Angeles office.
Consumer bankruptcy filings rose 9% in January 2026 compared to January 2025, with 44,282 consumer filings that month alone. Industrial filings leapt 49% year-over-year the greatest January level since 2018. The numbers show what financial obligation professionals call "slow-burn monetary pressure" that's been building for many years. If you're having a hard time, you're not an outlier.
Customer insolvency filings totaled 44,282 in January 2026, up 9% from January 2025. Business filings hit 1,378 a 49% year-over-year dive and the greatest January commercial filing level considering that 2018. For all of 2025, customer filings grew almost 14%.
Latest Posts
Exploring Government-Backed Debt Solutions
Creating a Strategic Recovery Program for 2026
Evaluating Debt Management Against Bankruptcy for 2026
